The words in a Language that lacks to mean the purpose for which it is created carries with it a sense of imperfection at face and awards itself the only one ever defeated cause of all the problems. The imperfection at the face can only be rectified when the words prompted carries with it precise meaning. When it is the want that we need the precise meaning of a word, the very word “Meaning - the purpose for which it is been created” is to be understood first. Every word is precisely a particular feeling, which should obviously be defined instead of substituting the same with some other word(feelings)or words.
When a feeling possibly expressed with more than one word (when we call it similar), obviously fails to define the happening perfect, the exact source of the word. Do we think that we are perfectly right all these days to learn the concept Similarity/synonyms instead of defining a word and it’s source the feeling..?
The confusion in understanding the happenings is just because of this approach in finding more than one word to define one’s feeling.
The books available to understand the precise meaning of a word should carry definitions of that word and not similarities or substitutions, which shall only cause imperfection of the language and stays as a permanent wall of hindrance from achieving the true purpose behind the creation of a Language.
- By Sabarish Jayaraman
No comments:
Post a Comment